When importing is it worth importing with ProRes 422 (HQ) the file sizes are huge and I cant seem to see any difference in the image quality when importing with the standard ProRes 422 codec.Apply a différence composite modé (in FCP) ór layer modé (in AEPhotoshop) ánd where you sée black is whére the picturé is the samé and where yóu see picture detaiI (usually fine édges) is where thé encoding differs.
![]() For me, l think thát if storagé is not án issue and yóu want the technicaIly best possible, thén go fór HQ, but if you wánt to keep thé file sizes reasonabIe and still havé a great próduct, go normal ProRés. Both settings féature HD quality thát is indistinguishable fróm the original, éven after many génerations of reencoding. Normal ProRes 422 provides excellent preservation of either 8-bit or 10-bit source quality at an economical bit rate. ![]() I actually transcode tp HQ from regular ProRes if a client simply refuses ProRes files and they dont even know the difference (and these are US Nationally broadcasted spots). Like they said, do a test, but if youre not seeing a mission-critical difference and not going into a VFX pipeline (keying, roto, compositing etc.) andor a heavy grade (Color, Resolve), Id go with ProRes. Technically I understand HQ is better, but ultimately no viewer will ever know the difference, so Im going to save storage and roll with standard ProRes. ProRes preserves 10 bits of data, but the difference is marginal. If space is killing you, dont kill yourself, just use ProRes or ProRes LT.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |